<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh, Darn!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yarnboy.com/wp/?feed=rss2&#038;p=358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yarnboy.com/wp/?p=358</link>
	<description>An Unusual Knitting Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: =Tamar</title>
		<link>http://yarnboy.com/wp/?p=358&#038;cpage=1#comment-18392</link>
		<dc:creator>=Tamar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yarnboy.com/wp/?p=358#comment-18392</guid>
		<description>Given that early machine knitters were described as &quot;weaving&quot; knitted garments on a machine &quot;loom,&quot; I say that the correct kind of mending, which you did, is true and proper darning.  The imitation kind that is woven back and forth like true tabby weaving is inferior work and only qualifies as &quot;darning&quot; by virtue of having been done with yarn on knitwear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that early machine knitters were described as &#8220;weaving&#8221; knitted garments on a machine &#8220;loom,&#8221; I say that the correct kind of mending, which you did, is true and proper darning.  The imitation kind that is woven back and forth like true tabby weaving is inferior work and only qualifies as &#8220;darning&#8221; by virtue of having been done with yarn on knitwear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
